Home > Uncategorized > The Hindu vs The Times of India : My 3 paisa

The Hindu vs The Times of India : My 3 paisa

Recently this campaign for The Hindu, broke in India and there’s been a ton of discussion, most of it positive.

I enjoyed the campaign as much as anyone else, in as much as one enjoys competitive ads. These ads are entertaining and bring a smile. Many a creative am sure are wishing they’d thought of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if it picks up a few awards along the way too.

Congratulations to Ogilvy for getting all of that right.

For what it’s worth I had 3 observations :

  1. Acquire/Retain: As a reader of Times of India,  I find the ads a tad insulting. They belittle me and my knowledge. Somehow assuming that as I read the Times of India, I am some sort of low-on-General-Knowledge person. If you make that assumption of your prospect I don’t see how he can be bright enough to subscribe to an ‘intelligent’ newspaper. On the flip side as a reader of The Hindu, I feel good that The Hindu is finally standing up and taking on the Times of India. Quite a few of my Hindu reader friends are very happy with this campaign. So I see this campaign working better with current readers than getting in new subscriptions.
  2. Why buy me: I think raising the Q of adequacy of information v/s the hierarchy of information are 2 different things. Eg Assumption that knowing the full form of UPA is more important than Hrithik Roshan’s pet name. Is it? Who decided that? I believe the stronger route could have been around the nature of information carried by The Hindu. For example : I remember when I lived in Chennai, and read The Hindu, in the context of sports we used to talk about among other things the fact that The Hindu, was the only paper in the country that carried scores of every county cricket match. I think some work could’ve been done in the area of information that The Hindu carried, to the exclusion of the Times of India and thus created a strong reason to buy The Hindu than just knocking the competition.
  3. Brand : The tone and manner of the campaign is quite at variance with The Hindu brand. Hindu is solid, conservative, intelligent, reliable, middle class. The campaign comes across as young, contemporary, ballsy. I see that as a bit of a mismatch. Add to it, the content of the paper is heavy reading and not quite in the same wavelength of the Twitter/SMS/FB generation who are the characters shown in the advertising. I think some fine tuning on this aspect by getting a little more targeted in the respondents, which would’ve been driven from point 2 above could make for a stronger campaign.

Then there’s also the issue that Bollywood is central to most media channels in India. Today’s Hindu carries this piece on Shahrukh Khan and is among the 5 most popular articles of the day. So knocking it in your advertising but carrying it in your product is a contradiction of marketing (not just communications) strategy.

I still think The Hindu campaign is a good campaign and I hope it works for The Hindu. Heaven knows they deserve a break after everything they’ve gone through over the past few years.

And I hope Ogilvy wins a few awards for it. Some old colleagues have their names against it!

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: